Indian businesses should take a “balanced” approach in dealing with China as excessive dependence on its supply chain could be detrimental to India’s national interest, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said on Thursday.
In an interactive session at industry chamber ASSOCHAM, Mr Jaishankar, at the same time, said he was not asking the Indian industry to not do business with that country.
To a question on evolving relations with China, he said with that country accounting for 32-33 percent of global manufacturing, it is logical that several supply chains will have to go through China.
“It is a reality which we will have to factor (that) into our calculations.” “But it is also a fact that if you become excessively dependent on a single supply chain or in the name of supply chain, you open up your market that it is no longer a supply chain, but your sectors are getting hollowed out. You have to be careful,” he said.
“Nobody is saying don’t do business. But we are equally saying think about it, weigh it, look at the bigger term implications,” he said.
The external affairs minister also briefly referred to the almost four-and-half-year-long border standoff between the two countries along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in eastern Ladakh that ended last month.
“We have managed to make some progress out there. We have to now sit down and discuss with the Chinese what we do further… You know, there are no black and white answers in very sharp terms. I think everything needs to be balanced,” he said.
To a question on disruption in the shipping lanes in the Red Sea in view of the situation in West Asia, Mr Jaishankar said trade is impacted by it.
“I think it is a big concern for us. We have tried to do our share. We actually deployed some Navy ships as well,” he said.
The external affairs minister said alternative routes for supplies are increasing the transportation cost of the shipments.
“It is of very direct economic consequence. So we have actually been interacting with all the major players including Iran and Israel,” he said.
“We want restraint. We want a cooling down. We want a ceasefire and we want negotiations so that actually our economic interests are not threatened,” he said.